|
|
U.S. Postal Service Under Attack
by John Beaumont, National Association of Letter Carriers
On January 17, 1962, President John F Kennedy signed Executive Order 10988. This granted Federal Employees, for the first time, the right to collective bargaining.
This action led to inspire many states and localities to follow suit, allowing their own workers to organize. This triggered a huge wave of unionization in the public sector that saw firefighters, teachers, janitors, social workers and many others form unions in the 1960s and '70s.
Now all this is under attack. The nation's postal unions, whose employees combine to be the largest Federal union in the nation, are being attacked through proposed legislation in the United States Senate.
As early as next week, S. 1789, the so-called 21st Century Postal Service Act, is moving forward for a floor vote in the Senate. This bill, reported out of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security by Senator Lieberman, would do the following:
- Cuts mail delivery from six days a week down to five days in two years' time if the Postal Service is not turning a profit, but fails to give the Postal Service any flexibility to achieve that profit.
- Phases out door-to-door delivery for consumers in favor of curbside and centralized delivery.
- Includes an anti-labor provision that would direct arbitrators to take into special consideration the financial condition of the Postal Service before rendering a decision. A direct attack on collective bargaining.
- Unfairly attacks injured postal workers by removing them from the OWCP rolls and forcing them into retirement without implementing a formula that would make these people whole. The reduction in compensation would be severe.
If Congress succeeds in this attack against the postal unions, it will shift its focus to the rest of the unionized federal workforce, including our newly certified brothers and sisters who are employed by TSA.
We need your help to stop this attack. Please call Sen. Dianne Feinstein at (202) 224-3841 and Sen. Barbara Boxer at (202) 224-3553 and ask them both to oppose S. 1789 in its current form. The legislation is deeply flawed and needs significant changes before the Senate should consider passage of this bill.
Changes to the bill should include provisions from S. 1853, which actually does take the necessary steps by addressing the issues laid out above to strengthen the Postal Service while maintaining the excellent level of service Americans have come to expect, preserving middle-class jobs and creating new opportunities for the Postal Service moving forward.
Posted on 01/26/2012 • Permalink
Reader Discussion
As a retired postal letter carrier we cannot let this happen. Congress is once again trying to destroy a much needed and valued service. I join my NALC brothers and sisters in opposing this action.
PLEASE CALL YOUR CONGRESSPERSON, AND DEMAND THAT THEY SAVE THE POSTAL SERVICE, AND JOBS
OF DEDICATED POSTAL WORKERS. THEY HAVE SERVED AMERICAN CITIZENS WITHOUT FAIL. PLEASE JOIN ME BY SUPPORTING OUR POST OFFICE.
They are Always do away with Some thing , They have wrong People Running , Save Post Office ;
Harry R. Beyer
A dismantling of Postal Service is a scheme
to profit private deliveries. The Service has
served us amazingly well and deserves to be
resurrected to its legitimate fiscal health
Do not let this bill pass. unlike the Ryan bill that give tax cuts to millionaires this bill is aimed at the working class as usually.
What is the Senate’s problem? The Post Office is the envy of the world, where else can you send a letter across the country for a measly $0.45 and it gets there in a few days, no where else that’s where! Gee I wonder, UPS, Fed-Ex and the rest must have been lobbying hard for this kind of legislation, they would love to see it pass. I call for a boycott of those companies services and throw our collective weight behind the USPS.


The U.S. Postal Service it an integral part of my life both at home and at work. Please, do not let this institution or it’s many employees be tossed aside.
The services provided are valuable to each and every person not only here in the states, but throughout the world.
I know I am not alone in this fight, and I appreciate your assistance to save this public federal work force. We will not get more jobs by illiminating federal employees.
You might try the progessive income tax, Eisenhower did.
at 12:31 am on Sat, Jan 28, 2012Posted by Stephen Anderson